http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/penile-cancer … 632. how about just circumcise the 632, instead of millions of healthy people
and how many of the hundreds of baby boys, whose parents openly talk about being circumcised, how many will you protect?
-
-
They don't need protection! As long as its carried out properly. They will have far less chances of health implications later on.
-
every circumcision is damaging. every circumcision destroys parts of the penis.
-
Going in circles. BS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If in the UK they'll have less chance of being the 25%!
-
you mean the 0.002 %
-
I'm done now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
SG, you forgot to mention a certain complication of infant circumcision, which is: unnecessary removal of pleasurable, functional skin.
-
This is a myth. Absolute BS. I've researched alot and men whove had it done later in life say no difference. Woman prefer it on large scale.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is that not an adverse implication of infant circumcision? Please explain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.