In our false-equivalency series, lets add the narrative that circumcision is the same as FGM. They are in no conceivable way equivalent. /1
-
-
Replying to @menagainstmras
When essentialized to "cultural practices of surgery involving genitals" they seem similar on the surface; the similarities stop there. /2
4 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @menagainstmras
Whereas circumcision has health benefits that out-way the cons usually, FGM has no health benefits for the women. /3 http://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/circumcision/basics/why-its-done/prc-20013585 …
10 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @menagainstmras
By whining about circumcision, MRAs are saying "this thing with pros and a few cons is equal to a thing with only cons." False equivalency.
17 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
"a few cons" is such a false and upsetting way to describe circumcision. The dismissive and minimizing words continue, so sick and sad
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.