Parents make many, many decisions that irrevocably affect their infant children. I see no compelling reason to outlaw male circumcision
-
-
That's like saying "I would like my kid without a leg. A healthy leg. Cut it off. Without anesthesia. In case it MAY get diseased"
-
No, it's not at all like that. That is a ridiculous comparison. This 2 things are not comparable.
-
As a parent I would NOT remove a healthy appendix or tonsils from my child simply because they might become diseased. Or for aesthetics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.