No argument on that point, but it should be the guy’s choice, not done when they’re infants or young boys incapable of fully understanding why or consenting.
If we oppose #FGM, we should oppose circumcision too. Religious reasons shouldn’t get preference.
-
-
Exactly, if FGM is a thing, then MGM is too! Let’s make
#MGM a thing!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
FGM is a thing and circumcision is not the same!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m not denying FGM is a thing, and is more extreme. You’re mutilating someone’s body either way, regardless of the extent. If you’re cutting the foreskin of a boy’s penis off, you are mutilating his genitals. Why can’t you just trust men to clean themselves if that’s the concern
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Because studies show most of their ‘cleaning’ is ineffective. Partner infection rates are high in uncircumcised men. UTIs mainly but STDs also. Untreated UTIs can KILL a woman. Civilized countries with antibiotics it’s a discomfort but for women without access to drs? Death.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Well, women are smart. Educate them to spot a dirty penis and not allow it to be stuck into them. In the meantime, it’s a man’s right to be considered a clean dick unless proven otherwise. Leave our foreskins alone.
#MGM1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh my. You can’t see bacteria but ok.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Can’t see it in a woman’s vagina either. Does every woman clean herself properly?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Lol. If you’re uncircumcised you’ll find out sooner than an circumcised guy...kind of the point.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
so imagine an entire continent full of uncircumcised men. What would that be like? Full of disease? Look at Asia, Europe, and south America. Billions of men who have no issues with their whole body.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.