So you believe it's numb? And you're going to ignore vaginal dryness due to the lack of glide? There are studies that show there is a difference. It's very hard to get a man to admit his manhood is deficient. At the very least it's causes many men a sense of loss and anger.
-
-
Replying to @TibbitTidbits @dkingpower7 and
Yes, because science have shown the foreskin have no actual bearing on sensitivity, as well as studies. "Vaginal dryness from lack of glide" another myth with no actual study backing it up, I'll gladly wait for one. These studies are few and most debunked or wrong. Yes, it-
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @TibbitTidbits and
even if that were true (its not) i shouldn't have to give reasons why my body parts are necessary to save them from being cut off without my consent.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @TibbitTidbits and
Babies have no bodily autonomy, it's the parent jobs to give to give that autonomy to save procedures. Are you really going to tell that you'll wait until you kids give consent to give them vaccines? Or a life saving surgery, since you obviously can't?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @stopcuttingboys and
Circumcision's not life-saving surgery though, not even a useful preventative procedure, so why make it conventional to perform on newborns?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ShebaLowry @stopcuttingboys and
Circumcision is used as a life saving surgery, when the foreskin is just too dangerous for babies. Circumcision has been proven to be a huge prevention of STDs
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @ShebaLowry and
haha, How often is the foreskins "just too dangerous" for the billions of men in europe, asia, india, south America that they need emergency circumcision? maybe 2 percent? If you believe it helps with std's (its not significant) you can try to convince adults that its worth it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @ShebaLowry and
It doesn't matter how often life saving circumcision happens, it does and therefore by your logic shouldn't be done because of "consent". I mean, I do recommend some guys to circumcised, so that's something.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @ShebaLowry and
if populations of millions are never circumcised and there is a extremely rare need for emergency circumcision, that means that routine infant circumcision on healthy children is not necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @ShebaLowry and
>tfw you never argued for routine infant circumcision Did you read my replies or are you making things up about me?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
so glad you agree that routine infant circumcision should be banned. Have a nice night :-)
-
-
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @ShebaLowry and
I'm against forced circumcision and that it should be up to the parents if they want one or not, so good night I guess?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Tweet unavailable
-
Replying to @dkingpower7 @stopcuttingboys and
Yes, like how leaving up to the parents to put vaccines in their child is forced vaccination. But I'm guessing that it didn't exactly shake you off your boots.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.