There are 29 other participants on the call, seven minutes before the hearing begins. Hello to everyone else wondering how the hell this madness is going to end
-
-
Judge Carl Nichols wants to hear more from TikTok's representatives about how the US government has avoided due process in its actions against TikTok. Interesting prompt
Show this thread -
-
If you had "plaintiff's legal team citing Hamas" on your TikTok/Trump lawsuit bingo card, take a drink
Show this thread -
Judge Nicholls seems to be needling in on the government's argument in a way that makes me think he's not 100% convinced by it
Show this thread -
Why aren't the government's actions in banning TikTok from the app store "at a minimum indirect regulations [of free speech]?" The judge asks the US government's lawyers
Show this thread -
It's never a good sign when the judge says they're familiar with the case law you're referring to and believe it refers to an outdated statute, is it?
Show this thread -
Having previously mentioned Hamas, we now have US government lawyers discussing bans on travel to Cuba in a lawsuit about whether an app should or shouldn't be banned
Show this thread -
If I'm understanding the US government's argument correctly, they're saying that anyone who uses TikTok for free speech is doing the equivalent of trespassing because national security trumps the first amendment
Show this thread -
OUCH. Judge Nichols asks the US government to disprove that the way they dealt with TikTok wasn't unconstitutional. "This was largely a unilateral decision with very little opportunity for plaintiffs to be heard... with the result of a farily significant deprivation"
Show this thread -
The US government responds that TikTok has received significant notice, and more than was provided in a case around the Holy Land (which is the second reference to Hamas in this hearing).
Show this thread -
US government's case concludes, and the judge asks TikTok for any rebuttal they have. Lawyers for the company cite the government's response to the WeChat case, saying that things have been done back to front
Show this thread -
Hearing ends. Judge's intent is to issue an opinion and order "some time later today, but before 11:59pm" when the ban would take effect.There'll be a public order containing the ruling, and to issue the opinion under seal to the parties to review for public issue tomorrow
Show this thread -
CANNOT WAIT for an afternoon and evening spent refreshing CourtListener
Show this thread -
I'm going to be on
@BBCNewshour later on to try and explain what's going onShow this thread -
The answer, because I'm going to bed soon, is we don't know. I figured by the judge's line of questioning that the TikTok app store ban won't happen, but then some legal folks who called the WeChat judgment confidently said they thought the judge gave TikTok as good a hiding
Show this thread -
This is a personal plea to judge Carl J Nichols,,, please,,, don't make me stay up until 5am UK time. Give yourself a Sunday night off and give your judgment in the next 20 minutes
Show this thread -
TikTok has earned a (temporary) stay of execution. It won't be banned from app stores in the United States, the judge in TikTok's lawsuit against the US government has declared. It's only delaying a decision by a few weeks, allowing the case to be properly litigatedpic.twitter.com/tWY7ZsSD31
Show this thread -
TikTok's official statement in response to the decision is much more conciliatory than its lawyers in the hearing yesterday, who said their client would rather not have to make a deal. Nonetheless, the psychodrama rolls onpic.twitter.com/Vy2qsxlpkV
Show this thread -
If you're a producer on a TV or radio programme, or an editor at a publication looking for someone to contextualise this for your audience, I'm writing the book on this and have been following every twist and turn
Show this thread -
You can also guarantee this is going in the book. Preorder it here to learn about what the hell has been going onhttps://www.canburypress.com/products/tik-tok-china-and-the-superpower-race-for-social-media-pre-order?_pos=1&_sid=46cf8888e&_ss=r …
Show this thread -
Big yikes in the just-unsealed opinion of the judge in yesterday's case about TikTok's app store ban. The US government's "prohibitions likely exceed the lawful bounds proscribed" by law. Not surprising, given it's Donald Trump, but this is a judge saying it in black and white
Show this thread -
-
The judge also says that data shared by users on TikTok wouldn't come under the Espionage Act, which the judge says the government was presenting "a novel reading" of in its argumentpic.twitter.com/Gb2rWLTjMJ
Show this thread -
Judge Nichols draws a line between China (which I don't think anyone disagrees is a national security threat) and TikTok, which he says "remains less substantial"pic.twitter.com/CdqUYaz7Ju
Show this thread -
Oof. Judge Nichols also seems to preclude potential issues with the government's remaining attempts to ban TikTok. "Plaintiff's IEEPA arguments are equally as applicable to [upcoming] prohibitions" as they are to the current app store ban argument. Doesn't look good for US govtpic.twitter.com/VaHf4azsg8
Show this thread -
Here's my story from this morning on why this was a must-win case for TikTok in the UShttps://www.businessinsider.com/tiktok-court-ban-cripple-user-numbers-2020-9?r=US&IR=T …
Show this thread -
Thing I didn't realise until
@BobbyAllyn pointed it out: Nichols was appointed by Trumphttps://twitter.com/BobbyAllyn/status/1310613740694298634 …
Show this thread -
Another thing I don't think we knew (which was in the sealed documents and was one of the redacted chunks in the US government's argument, see right) until now was that TikTok's Singapore servers are operated by Alibaba (see left)pic.twitter.com/CBRdxHvhXD
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
leaks. DM me for Signal