I criticized a political journalist's scientific reporting for failing to talk to any actual scientists with subject matter expertise and all I got was this lousy demand for an apology.pic.twitter.com/JalBUiFMvR
-
Yeah because your criticism was wrong and baseless. I did talk to several scientists including virologists. You just made that up that I didn’t. It’s despicable.
Which virologists? There are none named or quoted in the article. This is a simple question.
-
-
Journalists routinely talk to lots of people who don’t get quoted. Rasmussen doesn’t understand how journalism works. Neither do you apparently. I quote people with their permission. I don’t name everybody I talked to on twitter to satisfy trolls
-
Right but if you write an article about virology and can’t get a single virologist on the record that’s an enormous red flag. Thanks for the personal insult though, I thought you object to those.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Just what is the 'objectionable' part in the story? Its not clear either from your tweets or Rasmussen's.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.