Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce stevesi
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky
Ovjeren akaunt
@stevesi

Tweets

Steven SinofskyOvjeren akaunt

@stevesi

ॐ • investing • advising • writing • at @a16z @boxhq @tanium @everlaw… • Writings @ http://medium.learningbyshipping.com  • 📷•🧘🏻‍♂️• tweets kept for 3 months

Seattle • SV •  🌏
medium.learningbyshipping.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2008.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
    • Prijavi Tweet

    "What is the future of operating systems?" Is a great question that comes up quite a bit (like @Stripe yesterday). "Future of" is always tricky but one thing is always the case in software, which is everything interesting in tech moves "up the stack". Thoughts… 1/pic.twitter.com/qMyU3XfLb8

    What is the best computer for you? magazine cover with bill gates.
    13:32 - 25. sij 2020.
    • 125 proslijeđenih tweetova
    • 456 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
    • Eric Young Seamus Flynn Jake Hamby Ian Kar anne dwane Nauman Mustafa Chris Richardson Varun Singh Johnny Israeli
    14 replies 125 proslijeđenih tweetova 456 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        2/ In earliest days of microcomputers (PCs before PCs) it was not uncommon for those interested to spend most of their time debating the merits of various processors. This is from a 1977 debate.pic.twitter.com/n0Ca9jTfsj

        Is Z80 the wave of the present?
        2 proslijeđena tweeta 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        3/ At the time many believed that computing would evolve to have many competing "computers" built on different platforms. But this is never a sustainable state. Why? Because to move forward requires engineering abstractions, and abstractions mean interesting stuff moves up.pic.twitter.com/fpxifPPBKl

        Various computers in a review roundup.
        2 proslijeđena tweeta 39 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        4/ By 1981 consumer PCs became interesting (thanks to Apple, Tandy) and then IBM introduced the PC. Many think it was IBMs "footprint" that made the PC what it is. Maybe, but it was also the desire for creative people to stop worrying about details of processors and OS variety?

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        5/ The abstraction of the OS from competing chipsets created a vibrant world of software choices. While there were two main OS competitors (Apple and Microsoft) they were similar enough for a while that software ran on both. Mac and Win Excel 3.0 c. 1990.pic.twitter.com/5zPnxx0muc

        Excel 3 win
        Excel 3 mac
        3 proslijeđena tweeta 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        6/ Some thought this would be a steady state. But a growth market abhors a steady state. People are inventing and re-inventing, driving the underlying layers to provide new services and to rethink abstractions. And competition at OS layer drives innovation.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        7/ That competition resulted in a wave of graphical interfaces. From 1985-95 the industry was awash in various "GUI" approaches. Again, many thought the future looked like making a bet from 1 of many graphical systems. Windows, Mac, OS/2, NewWave, NeXT, Amiga, VisiOn, GEM…pic.twitter.com/glL8Zq0HqQ

        Many GUI examples.
        1 proslijeđeni tweet 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        8/ Once again the industry and market created a center of gravity that allows everyone (hardware, peripherals, apps, systems) to innovate while holding a few things constant. This is actually good for everyone. Honest.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 26 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        9/ Debates about which abstraction is "best" are often shown to be irrelevant or details that ultimately are deciding factors are often not what technologists would pick. Mac was superior in design, but breadth of PC hardware and ecosystem prevailed and became "best."

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        10/ Even though the Mac was "better" in some ways, the market pulled the PC through to a stronger product-market fit. That, for lack of a better word, made the PC "best". It would never settle the debate but if the score is number of units then the PC became best.pic.twitter.com/RbbBffi1YH

        Sales of PCs
        1 proslijeđeni tweet 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        11/ This cycle is not constrained to whole systems. Even within a technology system this cycle of diversity to consolidation around a "winner" happens constantly often due to externalities. Networking went through this as well.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        12/ While in PCs the "battle" between Netware and Windows was legendary ("better dead than red" the LanMan team would say) the internet and TCP/IP came along. For a while TCP/IP was yet another choice. Too much complexity that slowed innovation.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        13/ Here’s a long list of TCP/IP stacks for Windows 3 c '95. IDC estimated TCP/IP to grow to $1.7B in 1997. Windows NT was *designed* to deal w/network diversity. But really was it ever sustainable to have something so deep in an OS have diversity and complexity that results?pic.twitter.com/ZHDesdITsw

        List of many TCP/IP products reviewed in a magazine.
        2 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        14/ Early in innovation, products tend to be similar and by and large those building on the layer can abstract it (eg network drivers, x-platform apps). That is what happened with Android and iOS. Products start with the same needs (WWAN, basic touch, etc.) but rapidly diverge.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        15/ Innovation is two sided. The providers of abstraction are innovating as are those building on top. As much as everyone wants "stability" as a platform provider, stability is also stagnation. This causes the abstractions to diverge and working across them much more difficult.

        1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        16/ In the late 90s Windows and Mac diverged to a point that it became nearly impossible to keep the code bases in sync while also functioning like well-behaved apps. We see this today on mobile. Now mobile is such a huge market that stability might look like a duopoly.pic.twitter.com/4Iqz9odPIR

        OLE versus OpenDoc review
        3 proslijeđena tweeta 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        17/ That happens too. Many abstractions can support two, but not forever. That’s because at some point there are tectonic shifts in abstractions. That’s what the cloud is. Example: OracleDB and SQL were a duopoly (note usually it is like 80/20). But cloud upends everything.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        18/ The cloud is currently in state where many believe we in some natural state of multiple players. As a reminder, many observers (analysts, stock) love this situation. Like IDC and TCP/IP. The question for "future of OS" is what is the abstraction we are talking about?

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        19/ Today’s clouds, however, look to me a lot like debates over chipsets in 1977. Analysts call this "IaaS" but that confuses everyone as much as fighting over instruction sets. The real question is what are the key abstraction layers where economic leverage arises.

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        20/ Some believe the next platform will be defined by some sort of layer above, like an OS but cloudy. This is entirely natural. In fact the main "IaaS" providers will almost certainly innovate in these areas and third parties will do these as x-platform.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      21. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        21/ This will happen and it will become increasingly difficult to be "multi-cloud" no matter how much anyone wants to be. But this will likely be a database-like "market" and some logical subset will emerge, much to the chagrin of clouds and "apps" will be what matter more.

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      22. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        22/ I believe the real "next OS" then will be much more abstract at the services layer. Just as for many the next OS of the PC ended up being the browser and Office, the next OS for the cloud will be APIs that do really substantial work.

        1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      23. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        23/ Right now that seems like a fragmented and pretty narrow spaces (solutions) with a lot of players. It kind of is. But the companies that build services that abstract massive complexity will create whole ecosystems around that complexity.

        5 proslijeđenih tweetova 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      24. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        24/ Remember there were dozens of word processors, browsers, and TCP/IP stacks. There’s nothing about this leading to a conclusion that the BIG providers of infrastructure end up dominating in this space. eg who dominated DB apps? I would argue they will be challenged to do so.

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      25. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        25/ To them spaces seem too fragmented to them AND they do not want to alienate either customers or partners. They’d rather have many APIs for same thing than risk picking or building a "winner" too soon. This is the real challenge of building a platform during tectonic shifts.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      26. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        26/ Customers (devs, ecosystems) begin to demand a coherent platform, not just choice. Choice is expensive relative to innovation. Most don't want to innovate at a low level and want to offer domain specific or advance capabilities. Eg most don't want to build a browser.

        1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      27. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        27/ Today to platform vendors APIs look like "middleware" and focusing on supporting lots of middleware or tools for managing middleware or tools for managing at a lower level seem much more comfortable.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      28. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        28/ To me it means there is a lot of room for the next platform to emerge outside of what today is thought of as the cloud platform provider.

        3 proslijeđena tweeta 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      29. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        29/ If you think that is crazy, ask yourself where the PC platform came from compared to the dominate player, or the leading database (not IBM either), or where the browser came from, or where the leading mobile platforms came from. // END

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      30. Steven Sinofsky‏Ovjeren akaunt @stevesi 25. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        PS/ This thread is also why "market definition" in software, which essentially exists to continuously re-abstract and simplify so we can do more is so difficult. Without a cycle of invention-fragmentation-reabstraction we would still be arguing over chips and network protocols.//

        5 replies 3 proslijeđena tweeta 50 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      31. Kraj razgovora

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima