A 5-4 conservative split in a major immigration case, Hernandez v. Mesa. Court rules that a US border-patrol agent cannot be held to account for killing a Mexican boy at play across the southern border. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1678_m6io.pdf …
-
-
And here I was thinking that all law enforcement were not supposed to shoot at people who are running away from them and no threat to them or any American. Silly me.
-
If the person in question is brown or black—well, their very existence is a threat.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"legal mechanism" is too broad a statement. I think you mean civil cause of action against the officers. The officers can still be criminally prosecuted (and here was investigated), can also possibly be extradited, and can face loss of job and other penalties.
-
Yes, I meant a mechanism the parents could use to hold him accountable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What if it's in the arm or the leg?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
except being prosecuted which seems like quite a bit of accountability.
-
Easily slipped by with qualified immunity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lesson 2: don’t bring war if you’re not ready for war to be brought.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Would the same hold for American families if someone from the Mexican side shot People on the American side?
-
Nope, we’d pursue that like crazy, and then use it as evidence that everyone in Mexico is terrible..
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.