Justice Ginsburg has both dissents in the 5-4 decisions today. Here she says there is no reason why the boy's grieving parents should "face a closed courtroom door":pic.twitter.com/RyTaD4z5fl
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
Justice Ginsburg has both dissents in the 5-4 decisions today. Here she says there is no reason why the boy's grieving parents should "face a closed courtroom door":pic.twitter.com/RyTaD4z5fl
My report on the oral argument from Novemberhttps://www.economist.com/united-states/2019/11/13/can-a-border-patrol-agent-be-sued-for-killing-a-mexican-teen …
Here is Justice Ginsburg responding to the majority's claim that letting the boy's parents sue the rogue agent for damages would undermine American national securitypic.twitter.com/dSY3sE7548
RBG concludes by noting that the tragic killing of the boy is not an isolated incident.pic.twitter.com/Y2OD5vXbKb
In short: the Supreme Court has concluded by a 5-4 margin that there is no legal mechanism to hold border agents accountable for shooting Mexican children in the face if they are standing a few feet south of the US-Mexican border.
wtf? scary times!
Yea that makes sense
Terrifying
So... Maybe it should be considered an act of war.
Point being? Mexico is going to declare war on the US?
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.