I see so many newcomers to rails that find the routing table incredibly confusing. Especially that you use article_path but it says article.
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik Merb had a simpler thing where you just said url(:article) or url(:article, 42). Unfortunately didn't make it to Rails 3.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @topfunky
@topfunky@steveklabnik I like the article_path(article) helper because you can override and extend more easily than url(:article, article)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshsusser
@joshsusser@topfunky@steveklabnik Same, I find myself extending often. The routing table really isn’t that hard to grok.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FotoVerite
@FotoVerite@joshsusser@topfunky rails has traditionally tried to eliminate making people memorize pointless stuff1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@fotoverite@topfunky well you can blame me for the rake routes listing format. sorry for the confusion!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@joshsusser @FotoVerite @topfunky it's okay! <3 it's been a few years...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.