@mortice I'm not really interested in analytic philosophy.
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik any reason why? There's a fair amount of crossover between the philosophy of logic and language and CompSci.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rentalcustard
@mortice their rhetoric really annoys me, for one. I don't think it's as valuable overall as continental is to me, personally.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @rentalcustard
@mortice analytic philosophers. I wrote a bit about it here: http://wiki.steveklabnik.com/reading3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik philosophy of logic and language is ultimately about answering/dissolving philosophical questions by looking at the language.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rentalcustard
@mortice yeah, totally. most of the people in my list are based on structural linguistics or those who came afterwards2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik metaphysicians? Metaphysicists? Who knows?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rentalcustard
@mortice I'm not sure what you're asking, exactly. there's obviously some metaphysics in here, yes.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik in fact, the way to approach that seemingly deep metaphysical question is to observe that it's nonsensical. ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@mortice ahh, sorry. This is hard on twitter ;)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.