@JakCharlton @jbrains @steveklabnik Um... no? Are you going to claim that a white christian person is treated the same as a nonwhite muslim?
-
-
Replying to @lindseybieda
@lindseybieda@steveklabnik absolutely not, but you're also falling to fallacy, presuming you know the person better than they do3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda if you’re talking about ‘intent’ based on ‘what they meant’ then that’s 100% irrelevant.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda the privilege argument presumes you can determine intent from association (association fallacy)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda no, it DOES NOT. intent is 100% irrelevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda argue his words, not his associations2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda you cannot abstract words away from who said them, the time they said them, and where they did.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda but, I agree to tough and complex a conversation for Twitter. But "yawn" was just plain rude1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda it was rude because you were rude.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda apologies if you read it that way, not the way it was intended2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JakCharlton accepted. I read it as ‘lulz fallacies omg ur argument sux’.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.