@steveklabnik Needless to say, I call bullshit on that.
-
-
Replying to @jbrains
@jbrains@steveklabnik "privilege" argument fails on so many logical fallacies, it's always a BS call2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@jbrains@steveklabnik Um... no? Are you going to claim that a white christian person is treated the same as a nonwhite muslim?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lindseybieda
@lindseybieda@steveklabnik absolutely not, but you're also falling to fallacy, presuming you know the person better than they do3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda if you’re talking about ‘intent’ based on ‘what they meant’ then that’s 100% irrelevant.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda the privilege argument presumes you can determine intent from association (association fallacy)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda no, it DOES NOT. intent is 100% irrelevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda argue his words, not his associations2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda words come from a certain place in societal structure. that’s relevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda it's one factor, in amongst a thousand others.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JakCharlton @lindseybieda but really, i’m trying to do some work, so I’m not talking about this any more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.