@coreyhaines @ReinH @steveklabnik I find the privilege argument troubling, because by definition I can never be trusted. Unfair.
@JakCharlton @lindseybieda if you’re talking about ‘intent’ based on ‘what they meant’ then that’s 100% irrelevant.
-
-
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda the privilege argument presumes you can determine intent from association (association fallacy) -
@JakCharlton@lindseybieda no, it DOES NOT. intent is 100% irrelevant. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik@lindseybieda it also falls to single factor fallacy, genetic fallacy, and a list of others -
@JakCharlton@steveklabnik It doesn't fall to single factor fallacy, because it is recognized as being highly variable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.