Hey rbenv users: it’s good practice to keep your .rvmrc checked in, but what about .rbenv-version? I don’t know what you folks like.
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik In a world of increasing choice w.r.t. ruby runtimes, I don't know that I agree checking in .rvmrc is a good practice.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nontrivialzeros1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik I see the benefits, but one size doesn't always fit me, and it's a pain to disagree with a checked-in rvmrc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nontrivialzeros
@nontrivialzeros who says it has to be one size? it’s a shell script.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik I'm confused, but the gist is that I might want to run 1.9.3-perf instead of what's defined, and juggling git stashes annoys.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @nontrivialzeros
@nontrivialzeros it’s turing complete, so whatever method you want
6:20 PM - 24 Sep 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.