@tehgeekmeister I think I'd suggest 'feminism is for everybody' by bell hooks
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik i apologize that my original question didn't include anything about that, since that's what i really meant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heartpunkk
@tehgeekmeister roger. Hmm. I'll think about it.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik sorry for the longwinded explanation. that's why i recommend his book. it's all about that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heartpunkk
@tehgeekmeister morality is a bad way to frame it. Many of us Nietzsche fans don't even believe in morality ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik how that impacts society. whether you believe in morality in the abstract, you are human, and have the preconditions in you.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heartpunkk
@tehgeekmeister or say their morals are the opposite of 'zomg pc' as theyd say2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik specifically, by the theories i prefer, morality is a pre-rational process. you can't believe your way out of that sorta shit.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heartpunkk
@tehgeekmeister maybe you're speaking about ethics?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik it *certainly* is called moral psychology, though. whether it's subject is what you call ethics or not, i don't know.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@tehgeekmeister ya this seems to be an interdisciplinary terminology issue
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.