@JarrettB not outdated at all
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik the only non-aesthetic argument I buy for 80 cols is to not break ancient email servers.. and that's a shaky one2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik I don't, for exactly this kind of argumentation. I challenge you to find a 100-col line of my code that's hard to understand1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik so your entire argument boils down to "it doesn't display right on default xterm instances" or something?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik so it's not about display, and it's not about comprehensibility.. what aesthetic characteristic are you concerned about then?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik OK, but I still don't see how code > 80 cols becomes hard to read. sometimes you need a long sentence to express a thought2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.