@steveklabnik @angelaharms You don't agree?
-
-
Replying to @cherapple
@cherapple@angelaharms … i’m not sure that I’ve ever seen many contradictions actually resolved. ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@angelaharms What is "wisdom" but knowledge of what's true and what isn't? Contradictory things can't both be true.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cherapple
@cherapple@angelaharms I think this convo may be a BIT too complicated for twitter. :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@angelaharms Reality is the least complicated thing of all, I'd say.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cherapple
@cherapple@steveklabnik But I think Cheryl is talking about crazy-making shit like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting …, not, like, quantum physics.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @onealexharms
@angelaharms@cherapple … to be honest, I can’t take anyone who RT’s Molyneaux stuff seriously. Sorry. :/1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik This person? http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3656612-everyday-anarchy … How come? (I don't know them.)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @onealexharms
@angelaharms yes. because ‘anarcho-capitalism’ is stupid. and extremely unethical. And not even self-consistent.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik Oh, ouch. I can't tell you what's ethical, but I'll mention that ancaps I know don't call themselves libertarians.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@angelaharms sure. rothbard is the founding figure of ancap-ism though. also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism#Etymology …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.