-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@agnoster I fully admit that it wasn't solely or primarily for the worker's human benefits, but rather more real productivity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arsduo2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@agnoster let me know what you think when you read them. There's no obvious source for bias. (Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_ford#Labor_philosophy ….)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@agnoster yeah, I won't pretend this was for humanitarian grounds, just that sometimes interests align & things aren't b&w.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arsduo3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@agnoster you can get a lot, not everything but a lot, by changing frames of reference.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@arsduo It's *possible* to create a corporation with interests aligned with the workers, see (I think) Github or Valve.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.