I mean hey, seriously, call me crazy if I’m concerned that all of the commons is being shoved into one place. That just took $100MM.
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik I'd be more concerned if 1) each clone didn't carry the full history 2) it was true that non-github repos can't collaborate2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @littleidea
@littleidea also they can’t, not in the same way. or at least, github encourages lock-in1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik to date, github creates more value than they captured, if that trend changes, we'll route around them2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littleidea
@littleidea you trust people waaaaaay more than I do. I mean, we are talking on Twitter after all.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@littleidea We don’t pay to use Twitter because _we_are_ the product. Customers pay GH because it offers real fucking value.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @obfuscurity
@obfuscurity@littleidea I’m not saying github has no value. I’m saying that the control issues are pernicious.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@littleidea When there is no competition / CONSTANT DRIVE TO INNOVATE (internally) then maybe I’ll get concerned.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@obfuscurity @littleidea I find your faith in markets disturbing
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.