@steveklabnik Doesn't git itself lock you in too? Picking to use something always means giving it personal inertia.
-
-
-
@evanphx sure, but git isn't owned by a company. especially not by one with investors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik Only if you've got no spine. -
@henry_maddocks chill out on the machismo there, bro
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik 'social' lockin is your problem, not the vendor's / technologies. -
@henry_maddocks yes. It is my problem. That’s still a problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik well, the point of a good business is to not only make money but to create barriers to entry, right? -
@tolles right, that’s why we can’t trust them. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik social lock in sounds like "lack of decent alternatives". But I've seen (for example) sourceforge/github overlaps.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@steveklabnik social imperialism is my biggest annoyance with github… I have less respect for people who only contribute via github :/ - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.