@johnsheehan @garybernhardt it only could if it was something else entirely.
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik agreed. i wish dev-friendly were enough to make it something else completely, but that’s not a strong enough opinion to ride1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnsheehan
@johnsheehan it's fundamentally a control issue; they're still a company and they're not respecting standards, so...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik respecting standards rarely results in innovation. a git/github model could work, but the making git part is way harder2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnsheehan
@johnsheehan microblogging is a well-tread space, supporting those standards would give them much better good will.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@johnsheehan I wish http://status.net got more publicity. Open source and actively supporting activitystrea.ms2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darrel_miller
@darrel_miller@johnsheehan right, and rstat.us2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@darrel_miller mere existence does not make a standard. if there’s anything close to a practical standard it’s twitter’s API2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnsheehan
@johnsheehan@darrel_miller fundamentally disagree. Ostatus has a spec, it's been published, lots of diff implementors1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik that’s ok :) i see your point. i’m a much bigger fan of using actual usage to determine standards1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@johnsheehan I will have to write this post I think. ;)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.