@steveklabnik @jon_moore @hypermediaapis I don't think that is contradictory. XML and HTML have different targets and different problems.
-
-
-
@ironfroggy@steveklabnik@hypermediaapis But it's quite easy to write HTML that is valid XML.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik@jon_moore@hypermediaapis suppose they kind of have to like HAML then.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@steveklabnik@jon_moore@hypermediaapis Any ideas why? (XML-phobic will grok HTML). Draconian error handling? Other? -
@arh@jon_moore in the Rubyist case, it is usually attributed to Java PTSD. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik@jon_moore@hypermediaapis that’d be a lot funnier if so many people weren’t using HAML. :-( -
@searls@jon_moore HAML is still a minority among tempting languages. 30%-40% from what I've read. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik I actually became a lot less loathful of xml after doing a lot more html. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@steveklabnik@jon_moore@hypermediaapis Rails developers distance themselves from HTML by using HAML or JavaScript templates to render JSONThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.