For more, here’s my contribution to @CatoInstitute’s 2020 Supreme Court Review — which walks through the disingenuousness of the Court’s “hostility” to judge-made damages claims for constitutional violations by federal officers:
https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2020-09/2020-supreme-court-review-10_vladeck.pdf …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cc
@senatorshoshana for Willett being Willett. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StrictScrutiny_@LeahLitman can I get this in a tiktok summary? :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This looks very much like chumming for cert.
-
Not after Hernández II.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I remember judge willet when he was a regular person on Twitter. Glad to see his sharp craftsmanship making an impact on the federal bench.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What am I missing on his point that the FTCA doesn't allow for recovery from the United States for excessive force committed by federal officers - the law enforcement proviso expressly includes battery.
-
You have to prove battery under state law, something that James King's local p.i. attorneys - including
@pjaicomo - failed to attempt to do when they appealed his#Bivens claim but not his#FTCA claim to the#SixthCircuit. I would have at least tried! - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.