Steve VladeckVerifisert konto

@steve_vladeck

’s husband; father of daughters; Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts ; & co-host; ’s nerd;

Austin, TX
law.utexas.edu/faculty/stephe…
Registrerte seg september 2011
2 407 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @steve_vladeck

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@steve_vladeck.

  1. Festet tweet
    9. sep.

    I'm *so* excited to get to share this news! I'm also grateful to and her team for turning lemons into lemonade; I'm thrilled to get to work with and ; and I'm indebted to for letting me appropriate the term he coined:

    42 svar 60 retweets 692 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  2. for 3 timer siden

    What Paxton is portraying as Judge Pitman denying DOJ’s request for emergency relief against SB8 is just Judge Pitman denying DOJ’s request to *further* expedite the already expedited briefing. An injunction hearing is still set for October 1. Here’s the order:

    11 svar 55 retweets 219 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  3. for 4 timer siden

    Breaking news: is lying again.

    BREAKING NEWS! Federal Judge sides with Texas. I will never stop defending life in Texas.
    18 svar 101 retweets 488 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  4. Retweetet
    for 5 timer siden

    This is so wrong as to be embarrassing. Judge Pitman hasn't *ruled* on the preliminary injunction (the hearing is October 1); all he did today was deny the government's request to expedite his consideration of a TRO. Here's a full summary, with receipts:

    A federal judge just denied the motion for a preliminary injunction on the DOJ challenge to the Texas abortion law. The DOJ may have created unnecessary federalism and other issues with the filing.
    16 svar 143 retweets 650 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  5. for 5 timer siden

    H/T: , who got there first:

    This is just 100% false. The Judge declined to accelerate the briefing schedule and the PI hearing is set for October 1. He didn’t “den[y] the motion for a preliminary injunction.” How do you still have a bar license?!?
    Vis denne tråden
    6 svar 15 retweets 175 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  6. for 5 timer siden

    Here’s the order that claims is a denial of a preliminary injunction. Read it for yourself; he clearly didn’t:

    6 svar 24 retweets 204 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  7. for 5 timer siden

    This is so wrong as to be embarrassing. Judge Pitman hasn't *ruled* on the preliminary injunction (the hearing is October 1); all he did today was deny the government's request to expedite his consideration of a TRO. Here's a full summary, with receipts:

    A federal judge just denied the motion for a preliminary injunction on the DOJ challenge to the Texas abortion law. The DOJ may have created unnecessary federalism and other issues with the filing.
    16 svar 143 retweets 650 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  8. Retweetet
    for 11 timer siden

    Consistent with my earlier tweet, I think this is the right call. If you believe that the Fifth Circuit is likely to block *any* order granting relief from (so that you gain nothing from moving faster), then taking time to make sure you get it right can only help at .

    11 svar 21 retweets 182 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  9. Retweetet
    for 11 timer siden

    Judge Pitman has denied DOJ’s request to move even faster in resolving its request to block pending further review; we’re still set for a preliminary injunction hearing on October 1:

    3 svar 23 retweets 92 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  10. for 11 timer siden

    Consistent with my earlier tweet, I think this is the right call. If you believe that the Fifth Circuit is likely to block *any* order granting relief from (so that you gain nothing from moving faster), then taking time to make sure you get it right can only help at .

    11 svar 21 retweets 182 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  11. for 11 timer siden

    Judge Pitman has denied DOJ’s request to move even faster in resolving its request to block pending further review; we’re still set for a preliminary injunction hearing on October 1:

    3 svar 23 retweets 92 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  12. Retweetet
    16. sep.

    because what is yom kippur if not a festival of menorahs & happiness

    187 svar 507 retweets 7 731 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  13. 16. sep.

    Update: DOJ, is asking Judge Pitman to rule on its request for a temporary restraining order *before* ruling on the preliminary injunction, and has proposed a hearing for next Tuesday (9/21). (In other words, DOJ is pressuring the court to move faster):

    6 svar 53 retweets 266 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  14. 15. sep.

    Major ruling by the Fourth Circuit on NSA surveillance, holding (over a partial dissent from Judge Motz) that ’s challenge to “Upstream” collection under section 702 of is barred by the state secrets privilege — and so must be dismissed:

    3 svar 26 retweets 36 liker
    Angre
  15. 15. sep.

    If he issued a TRO, TX could ask the 5th Cir. to review the TRO immediately (via a writ of mandamus), and to stay the TRO (and all district court proceedings) pending that review. This way, there's time to fully brief and decide the injunction request *before* the case can go up.

    5 svar 46 retweets 406 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  16. 15. sep.

    In DOJ's suit against TX challenging , Judge Pitman has scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing for Oct. 1. He has *not* granted a TRO, so the ban remains on the books for now. That's actually *very* savvy to me, because it stops TX from going right to the Fifth Circuit.

    28 svar 354 retweets 1 166 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  17. 15. sep.

    A colleague and I were just loudly recounting Game 6 of the 1986 NLCS when noted Astros fan walked by. Whoopsies.

    7 svar 1 retweet 45 liker
    Angre
  18. 15. sep.

    👀

    New low for among voters: negative 37 – 50 percent job approval rating, with 13 percent no opinion. "This is the worst job approval since Quinnipiac University began asking the question in 2004, and a steep drop from July 2020, when registered voters approved 52 – 37 %"
    Vis denne tråden
    29 svar 109 retweets 593 liker
    Angre
  19. 15. sep.

    Don’t get me wrong; What Gen. Milley reportedly did borders on insubordinate, could well be grounds for his removal as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, & raises hard Qs about civilian control of the military. But the t-word means something far more specific:

    30 svar 84 retweets 496 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  20. 15. sep.

    Things that *are* treason: Commanding the Army of Northern Virginia in a war against the Union. Things that are *not* treason: Talking to foreign leaders about how you fear the President will start a war as a pretext for unlawfully staying in power/taking steps to prevent that.

    31 svar 425 retweets 2 354 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  21. Retweetet
    15. sep.

    The Justice Department has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in Austin federal court in its suit against Texas seeking to block —the controversial ban on nearly all abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy:

    21 svar 493 retweets 2 089 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre

@steve_vladeck har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·