I assume you are talking about moi? Sorry if I didn’t give your idiotic tweets the proper attention that you feel you deserve. The reality is that they were histrionics at best vying desperately for attention as the pseudo intellect you think you are.
https://twitter.com/steve_parkes/status/1144241412675899392 …
Very good. When he's finished railing on Autistic people and starts on people waving rainbow flags I'll be back to tell him he's wrong again. Will you join me?
-
-
Condoning targeted harassment? I don't think
@Twitter likes that. -
Wow, you people really don't see the big picture. Report that tweet if you don't get the references and see how the report is shot down. I'm defending against targeted harassment. :)
-
I don't know who "you people" are or why you think I'm one of them, and I don't care what the "big picture" is. You stated that you wanted people to harass someone on Twitter. That's condoning targeted harassment by definition.
-
Where what?
-
Where "You stated that you wanted people to harass someone on Twitter" is this call to harassment made. That's illegal here in the UK and I will give you the phone number of my local force should you show me evidence.
-
"When he's finished railing on Autistic people and starts on people waving rainbow flags I'll be back to tell him he's wrong again." You saying you will harass someone. "Will you join me?" You asking others to harass someone. You know, English.
-
Yes I do. Rather better than you it seems. You prat ;)
- еще 5 ответов
Новая переписка -
-
-
How about you take that energy and use it constructively? Focus on a policy position you feel strongly about instead of making the harassment of William Shatner some kind of cause. What do you change if you “succeed,” and what does your “success” in such a thing even mean?
-
You don't think educating a man who is being very publicly wrong on a issue that causes real harm to members of society is constructive? Odd form of socialism you're following ;)
-
I’m a Democratic Socialist. No, I just think you’re grandstanding for attention. If you care about autism or lgbtq rights Bill Shatner is not standing in your way.
-
I'm not grandstanding. I didn't come here for attention. I came to defend a young women (who has since been hounded off twitter) by bringing facts to that show a charity Bill supports has a well documented poor history but ,you know, don't let facts get in your way.
-
If you have facts and a specific incident then maybe that’s what you need to lead with. Please show me.
-
I'm not your Google. Read his time line. The other person I suggested do that was appalled and unfollowed him.
-
You make a claim, you know where the information is, it’s got you this worked up — and you don’t show it. You make finding it a virtue test, instead. Manipulative and questionable.
- еще 1 ответ
Новая переписка -
-
-
No you intellectually dishonest individual
-
In a thread where I'm RT'd saying somebody is selectively RTing in an intellectually dishonest way I'm accused of being intellectual dishonestly for reminding people where this all started. Bill selectively RTing me quoting "First they came for..." ;) I chuckled.
-
You seem to think you know everything and that all people with autism think like you. They don't. That is massive arrogance on your part.
-
Citation needed. I've never made any claim that all Autistic people think alike. It's massively arrogant of you to assume this.
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
Загрузка может занять некоторое время.
Вероятно, серверы Твиттера перегружены или в их работе произошел кратковременный сбой. Повторите попытку или посетите страницу Статус Твиттера, чтобы узнать более подробную информацию.