Truss in the headlines for one day and look what happens (kidding - probably an outlier).
Or maybe not.
Approvals:
Starmer: +6 (-3)
Hunt: -16 (-3)
Sunak: -20 (-2)
Best PM now has a big Starmer lead:
Starmer: 41%
Sunak: 32% (-3) twitter.com/RedfieldWilton…
Of course, these two websites are linked: governments are excited by the benefits of better understanding their own data, but nervous that sharing that information with their electorates will end badly for them:
The second is the UK's Covid-19 Dashboard, a brilliant innovation which, essentially the UK government has decided is so good they want lots more from the people who helped make it, but don't want anyone else to be able to see it for themselves:
The independent commission set up to determine if Manchester City should be punished for alleged financial breaches spanning more than a decade will have the power to strip the club of its previous titles, @theipaper can reveal.
https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/man-city-can-stripped-premier-league-titles-financial-breaches-2131451…
O/c, it's true to say that machine intelligence should not be the final decision-maker. John Thornhill wrote a great piece recently on the need to modernise the world's nuclear launch procedures, as it happens, if you want to read about a real problem:
Thanks to the 'for you' tab, I have discovered a new level of 'inventing a guy to get mad at': a text-generating AI (which can't speak) is refusing to drop a N-Bomb to stop a H-Bomb.
New analysis looking at how much money Chelsea have really spent under the new owners.
Yes, player amortisation, longer contracts and other accounting tomfoolery will help meet FFP regulations, but what does this mean in the real world? #CFChttps://swissramble.substack.com/p/how-much-money-did-chelsea-really…
🚨HUGE UNHEDGED NEWS🚨
*Everyone* can sign up for FT's premium markets newsletter for 90 days for FREE (it's usually behind 2 paywalls!)
Here's the link: https://tinyurl.com/mvyz58ny
There are a lot of Conservative MPs willing to very forcefully express their disgruntlement. But for a clue as to which way power is flowing in the Tory party, look at what MPs feel able to say publicly:
And the most important thing about it (because this influences the decisions made or deferred for the next two years at least) is that it is thus far, by its own standards, a successful comeback tour:
Liz Truss's 'sorry not sorry' tour is focussed squarely on the Conservative party: a long essay for the paper read by more party members than any other, a sitdown interview with the magazine read by its power-brokers:
This is dreadful viewing. Increasingly feel like Viv and Beth's injuries were the death not only of our title challenge, but of our Champions League qualification.
I preferred it when Everton were a good team who never beat even very bad Arsenal sides, to now, when Everton has become a team who cannot beat anyone *other* than Arsenal.
In the spirit you should write down your worst predictions: there is more chance of me being elected Grand Duke of the KKK than there is of the SNP picking an evangelical Christian as its next leader.
I have lost count of the number of people, unionists and nationalists, business veterans and third-sector enthusiasts, who have come away from dealings with Kate Forbes hugely impressed, writes @chrisdeerin. https://newstatesman.com/politics/scotland/2023/02/kate-forbes-snp-best-hope?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1675432915-1…
*sisyphus on the phone with his parents* yeah i’m actually making a ton of progress with the boulder…no there’s not really like promotions…no yeah I can definitely ask
on the 'U' shape of public tax/spend over lifecourse. Net gain at start/end of lives (when need it most) and net loss in the middle. But difficult to appreciate e.g. when a baby, or when haven't yet received the benefit https://on.ft.com/3RwBohz via
Good news! You can now subscribe separately to my Inside Politics newsletter (the first *90 days* are free): https://ft.com/newsletter-signup/inside-politics?segmentId=1a38ca98-d8ac-e698-d19e-722769694cf5…
I think it's a good example of how voters have a more sophisticated grasp of their material interests (boomer welfare is good class politics for many, many young voters!) than a lot of politicians:
'Intergenerational warfare' is a product with plenty of willing sellers in Westminster but very few buyers in the country as a whole. This excellent column by
on the trend of 'presenticians' - current or former MPs with their own shows. Channels want content; politicians get recognition. It's a challenge to broadcast norms & the party machine. Could it lead to a British Tucker Carlson too?