If you live in a country with a crappy gov/central bank, why store your wealth in a non-productive money asset if you can access a productive asset like S&P 500 or some other equity index instead?
-
-
Not sure I understand: the implied return then comes because (due to deflation) they can buy more stuff?
-
Yes, under a sound money standard, we should anticipate our money has a slight appreciation in real purchasing power Contrast that with now where holding fiat gives you a slight loss every year
-
Ah! Just wanted to ask about inflation. Also: what do you mean by "sound money"? This rather random Google search isn't helpful
pic.twitter.com/oHJV7rmL72
-
sound money refers to money chosen on the market for money (w/o govt intervention). Sound money can be contrasted with fiat/easy money. If you're interested to learn more, maybe check out my podcast series here:https://stephanlivera.com/2018/07/26/launching-podcast-slp1-saifedean-ammous/ …
-
sounds good - bookmarked :)
-
Bitcoin will eventually become deflationary because people lose private keys, leave dust amounts on old addresses, etc.
-
Agree on the dust part. Unsure about losing keys: under the assumption that bitcoin= new money, storage systems will improve.
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
-
-
It’s not hard. If there’s an amt of economic activity that grows on avg 3-5%/y using a fixed supply currency, how much would the value of that currency grow (on avg over time)? Compare that to losing 3-10%/y in fiat to inflation. This is why people, given a choice, will-> scarce$
Спасибо. Твиттер использует эту информацию, чтобы сделать вашу ленту лучше. ОтменитьОтменить
-
Загрузка может занять некоторое время.
Вероятно, серверы Твиттера перегружены или в их работе произошел кратковременный сбой. Повторите попытку или посетите страницу Статус Твиттера, чтобы узнать более подробную информацию.