I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the U.S. Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense.1/15
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
There is no need for more evidence to prove that the president asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter; he said this on television on October 3, 2019, and during his July 25, 2019, telephone call with the president of Ukraine. 2/15
1.901 reply 1.236 proslijeđenih tweetova 5.444 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a “mountain of overwhelming evidence.” 3/15
1.483 proslijeđena tweeta 5.215 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
There is no need to consider further the frivolous second article of impeachment that would remove the president for asserting his constitutional prerogative to protect confidential conversations with his close advisers. 4/15
1.448 replies 993 proslijeđena tweeta 5.152 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. 5/15
4.349 replies 1.059 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.807 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law. 6/15
723 proslijeđena tweeta 3.245 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
But the Constitution does not give the Senate the power to remove the president from office and ban him from this year’s ballot simply for actions that are inappropriate. 7/15
3.848 replies 895 proslijeđenih tweetova 4.491 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. 8/15
2.936 replies 695 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.177 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
"We should let the election he's stealing decide if stealing elections is okay."
-@SenAlexander #ShamImpeachmentTrial
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @stealthygeek @SenAlexander
Sham trial, Alexander is full of s*it.
0 replies 1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.