Thank you for your service
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have a similar portmanteau describing papers where p-values in the range 0.030-0.049 appear in clusters, thus suggesting p-hacking...
-
Ioannidis has wonderful data showing just how implausible the distributions of p-values in published papers are. But can also be file drawer effect.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dangerous. One could easily mispronounce that!



Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice. Between this and the discovery of a whole new continent this week, it’s getting tought to keep up with the scientific breakthroughs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mentally substituted u for a when I read it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I never used p = 0.05. that's barely a statistical blip. In my work I didn't consider a result suspicious until it was three sigma from expectation or p < 0.01. Physicists require five sigma.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now do whackademic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Brilliant!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.