Noooo ... this is on the House Managers. They didn’t make a convincing case and they brought the weakest impeachment in history to the Senate.
Maybe they shouldn’t have rushed things in the House.
https://twitter.com/senschumer/status/1223410368283848704 …
-
-
He was impeached for lying under oath. He was under oath because he was being sued for his track record of
#MeToo
’ing government employees.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Clinton was not impeached for getting his bent dick polished. He was impeached for perjury, obstruction of justice and witness tampering. If he had not lied about it, he woulds not have been impeached
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yo purple, grab a history book.
-
That would require reading.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Don't forget he was disbarred by the Arkansas Supreme Court, and also admitted to his guilt. But I would think some blue state gal you claim to be, would be all over Bill, in this
#metoo
period, since he had these relations with a subordinate intern. - Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Perjury. Get it right.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
#History is hard.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Nice hot take. I’ll informed, but that’s probably why you’re on the left....
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

Also over 60% were against impeachment in Clinton’s case. So spare us the tears (especially since you all sure wanted witnesses in THAT case!)