Just close your eyes and imagine how much creativity and productivity could be unleashed if basic CAD was as accessible as a document editor.
-
-
i gotta say, my own experience is 100% to the contrary. i designed legit CNC'd parts first with Sketchup, then taught myself Inventor (lucky to work somewhere that had licenses, but near zero mentorship/guidance). then a string of pirated licenses, then Fusion + Eagle.
-
It’s the “lucky to have free access” followed by “a string of pirated licenses” that I think is both common and where this chain is weak. We need someone to bring in the 2006 iTunes Store to fix the rampant workaround for a lack of a satisfying accessible option.
-
i know you've seen the replies already, but Fusion is really impressive and both it and Eagle are virtually or literally free with a ton of online documentation. i would have agreed with you in ~2012, and agreed that HW != SW, but it's remarkably easy to get into today.
-
EAGLE needs improvements so badly. Yeah, it’s free. I still keep it in the category of things that might be replaced and thereby unlock a huge amount of productivity.
-
but my point would be that once you’re ready to ditch Eagle the cost of Altium prob isn’t the #1 thing holding you back from pursuing hardware. Tho my ulterior motive of trying to get smart people to discard the Bay Area’s SW bias might be influencing that perspective ;) -
It’s not possible to measure how much is lost nor how many are turned away from hardware as a result of the challenges around using the tools
-
Being honest, I think even I feel a certain amount of dread about what a pain it is to deal with any/all of the ECAD options, which is a hurdle/setup cost I still face and have to get over if I’m thinking of doing a new project. And I’ve used or written my share of ULPs.
-
Also FWIW I think this outlook on Altium is false. I think the cost is still prohibitive even in many professional contexts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’ve gotten into Fusion 360 lately after years of 4-figure/year CAD and it’s blown me away with what’s it’s capable of. And often on sale for $99/yr.
-
I feel like last time I used Fusion360 I wanted to like import a standard 3D file format and got denied. Like it's really exciting but then has these stumbling blocks where I never know if I'm going to be able to do what I need to do?
-
Yep. It’s funny to think of good interop as a “pro feature” but considering the decades of formats to support it’s not that surprising. I have to add that I had the same format struggles with Inventor, at $250/month. No good OBJ/gltf/etc exports... just used STL!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What would your “dream CAD” editor do differently from currently available ones?
-
It’s a VERY long list for ECAD. Check out EAGLE, which has time traveled through to the modern day all the way from 1995. For mechanical CAD, a model of affordability and machine requirements similar to Photoshop would be superb.
-
i don’t have much familiarity with ECAD tools, but it always blew my mind that 1) SPICE tools are all kinda terrible 2) no one had nicely integrated SPICE tools into ECAD (to my knowledge). and that feels like the tip of the iceberg.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, what's wrong with paying for compilers? When I paid for compilers, they were fast, and computers were not. Today, the reverse.
-
Not really a comment on paying for compilers.
-
Right. Just thinking that there seems to be a price at which accessibility is universal but diversity/quality of products per $ falls fast?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I just twist Blender into doing what I want
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For Mech, OnShape is one I'm keeping an eye on. ("Freemium" IIRC). I'm definitely excited to watch this revolution roll in :)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.