It's surprising to me that people think "every belief should be possible to say out loud" is killing freedom of expression and experimentation, and not, say, a lack of housing that undermines the viability of artist communities.
Show this thread
-
surely we need both?
I'm thinking about it. I'm not convinced that there aren't externalities some of the types of expression advocated for that aren't themselves hazardous and therefore worth carefully considering carefully the utility of such expression.
-
-
For example - presumably I could concoct a type of expression that was ultimately harmful to startups even in light of the argument that increased freedom of expression is beneficial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
for sure you could. but i think people should argue the idea, not call for you to leave the church or industry or whatever.
-
If someone's behaviour causes harm to others, why is the appropriate response to attempt to change their behaviour rather than remove them from the position of being able to cause harm?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sometimes these arguments aren't made in good faith. Sometimes those externalities are the intended purpose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.