Why does this single company's funding round imply a bubble?
-
-
Replying to @starsandrobots
And I expect it’s based on some expectation of rapid acquisition by a large automotive company, so hypey.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikellTaylor
Ok but a bubble would be industry-wide and I would not believe this was typical.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
I do think the vision/ML/self driving space is increasingly bubbly. Not all are getting ridiculous investments like this, but hype for sure
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikellTaylor
I've no idea what JingChi is actually doing but if they're, say, spinning up a chip fab.. how much seed should they raise?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
Their website claims all their technology is software. Plus, the sheer number of LIDAR/self driving rounds in that Robot Report writeup...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikellTaylor
Diffusion of Schumpeterian rents has to happen somehow :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots @MikellTaylor
I'm mostly poking at the assertion that there's a correct or standard seed size. Yea it's a pile - and I hope they use it well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
I just had so many “wtf” reactions to a $3M seed round this seems ridiioooooculous
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MikellTaylor @starsandrobots
So is that ridiiiiiiiculous typo
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I was enjoying trying to pronounce it, in my head. (— the woman who started the renouned "plibmttbhgaty" event series)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.