Having been on the opposite side of these narratives, I think startup sniping is a lazy and intellectually dishonest hobby.
-
-
Replying to @terronk
I see your point, but I’m also troubled by the other extreme of Assume It’s A Good Idea Until Proven Otherwise
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MikellTaylor @terronk
since so many resources (money, people, time) can be spent on stuff before a bad idea finally gives up the ghost
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MikellTaylor
I think this worldview is incorrect, but smarter people than I, like you and
@seldo, disagree with me. Would have this discussion in person!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Short version: VC exists to enable risk. Without it, there is less tech. Risk is good, failure happens, many good ideas looked bad at first.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Agree in principle, don’t see it played out so well in practice. Similar to defense programs - they get funded and re-funded much longer
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
than they should because of ego of those funding; don’t want to admit failure, or lose future funding ops. So feedback mech is broken.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And that’s my concern with where we are on startups atm - bubble-ish. Very hypey. “Fail often” doesn’t seem to be happening.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Or rather, “fail fast,” sorry, misspoke. And think that’s largely because of investors insisting these co’s must be justified somehow.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
To be fair
@starsandrobots always told me I wasn’t operating properly under the “uplifting” MO of SV tech, that the trend is to support/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Omg wait no I don't think it's a trend at all. Ahhh I can't get enough air to express what I actually meant via twitter
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.