I have been thinking about the paradigm of "commands" in programming, and whether softer/more 'polite' language could improve the machine UI
-
-
Replying to @starsandrobots
Bear with me. Do you see computers as intimidating, did people you know see them this way? Or are they dumb machines, tools, automata?
10 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
Given Conway's Law, haven't machines been created in the mentality of the pioneers of computing? Are these languages not their languages?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
Wouldn't, therefore, it make sense to explore programming languages that sound less oriented to "telling machines what to do"?
7 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
It's v difficult to compress these thoughts for twtr I'm just wondering if commanding language in some sense is a needless barrier to entry
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
And if perhaps in your social context you're more used to requests than commands, a programming language could be created in that context
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @starsandrobots
Maybe this is all really out there or syntactic sugar or just too much social theory for real computing but hey, Twitter, just a thought
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots
If I'm understanding you, it's the digital equivalent of Sapir-Whorf that has the added benefit of bringing comps into our social fabric.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Basically! cc @timhwang
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.