I have been thinking about the paradigm of "commands" in programming, and whether softer/more 'polite' language could improve the machine UI
-
-
And if perhaps in your social context you're more used to requests than commands, a programming language could be created in that context
-
Maybe this is all really out there or syntactic sugar or just too much social theory for real computing but hey, Twitter, just a thought
-
Basically this thought germinated when I did thishttps://twitter.com/starsandrobots/status/380857763733073920 …
-
It was pretty much a whim at the time but I felt this huge relief when I "please !!" instead of "sudo !!" - it fit better as language
-
So what will this shell be called , maybe lovsh or something warm and fuzzy like that?
-
I'm not sure that request-based conversational patterns are strictly cast in a setting of feelings of love, per se
-
So maybe the shells name would be more along the lines of courteoush. Since it uses "please" and maybe a form of "nice" called "excuse me".
-
Probably just as good as "curses"
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You mean like, non-imperative paradigms? There's dataflow & constraint programming, both more human-friendly but often ghettoized
-
Not really. I think this could possibly be as facile as imperatives structures as requests. Like an extension of "try..catch" forms
-
Yeah sorry now I read the whole thread and I see where you're going with it
-
Now that I think about it, a conversation metaphor especially makes sense over network boundaries. Fits imperative rather poorly
-
hypertalk-ish: ask server to please add numbers with x as 2, y as 3 if server is silent … if server says sorry …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.