I'm not upset, I just don't see this particular security control is likely to be effective against the claimed threat.
-
-
Replying to @marshray @starsandrobots
There are lots of other reasons you don't want drones over crowded stadiums.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marshray @starsandrobots
We should use appropriate mitigations for most probable risks, instead of ineffective reactions to the most dramatic risks
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @starsandrobots
Probably the most probable threat is some jerk launching from the parking lot and accidentally crashing into the stands.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marshray @starsandrobots1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @marshray @starsandrobots
My guess is the military will be deploying some actual high altitude surveillance and 30 NM is their threat zone.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @starsandrobots @marshray
but these TFRs also happen incredibly frequently without military support
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starsandrobots @marshray
and IIRC for Super Bowls, normal VFR flight is also banned in the region for the duration
10:03 PM - 3 Feb 2017
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.