that DARPA people (assuredly, smart folk) make wins by pointing at big audacious bets that have paid off, works for them.
I'm not convinced of this; I think incentive alignment has much to do with their effectiveness (at least, today)
-
-
-
(having $3B to need to spend helps as well, for sure)
-
by contrast, many corporate innovation centers have brilliant people & audacious plans, yet bungle in bureaucracy still.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.