@starsandrobots @xek with microwave RF though, I think there are some good reasons to ensure that certain paths don't align.
-
-
Replying to @starsandrobots
@jof@xek also asymmetric jet engine intakes because of CFD software. So, I hail the equivalent design tool improvements for EEs.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @starsandrobots
@starsandrobots@jof I still want to build a layout expert system, which knows all the constraints to satisfy. (But I have to support a kid)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xek1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @starsandrobots
@xek@jof I'm curious especially in light of, say, the routing step being provably NP-hard (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Routing_(electronic_design_automation) …)3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @starsandrobots
@starsandrobots@jof I'm mostly interested in the giant heuristic win of allowing component layout, which simplifies the toposort of traces.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xek1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @starsandrobots
@starsandrobots@jof Yes, which allows for multiple learned routers to duke it out in optimizing the traces within the placements.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xek
@starsandrobots@jof (The CFD people use fuck-off supercomputers; with that horsepower, I know that we could do similarly powerful things.)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.