Conversation

Agreed that this can be much better. One of

’s goals is to facilitate cross chain swaps. Maybe we should be including logos of the origin chain whenever referencing these tokens? Or maybe these token icons should somehow signify their origin chain? Tough UX problem.

Quote Tweet

osmo1sunny

@sunnya97

· Jan 29

Is this a sane UX?

Show this thread

Replying to

and

I think a better ux is to select asset, chain, and bridge during swaps Check out bridge.terra.money

8:32 AM · Jan 29, 2022Twitter for iPhone

Replying to

and

Fully agreed, add selectors instead of table overview!🤝

Replying to

and

Totally agree. User doesn't need too see everything. As a matter of fact user doesn't care about seeing these details. Will clean up things a little bit.

Ian Macalinao

@simplyianm

Jan 29

It’s important for each of these individual pools to have liquidity, because users from each chain uses these pools to bridge into Solana. We should probably separate bridged tokens from native assets on

Show replies

Replying to

and

Agreed that this is the best UX for cross-chain swaps. LP tokens are a bit tougher since not every UI is built with cross chain applications in mind. We need a way of rendering bridged assets that doesn’t use so many acronyms

jimthereaper | in bombay

@jimmyhumania

Jan 29

You can always hyperlink the acronyms to the relevant chain or bridge (with url parameters)

Replying to

and

How awesome it would be if blockchain networks are able to mimic the telecom's international roaming capability, then bridging would be seamless.

Replying to

and

! You were nominated by blockchain elites to be one of the candidates of the Blockchain Person of the Year election! We all admire your contributions on the crypto and world. Check out this decentralized election! It'd be great if you can vote in this election!

Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Show