Conversation

I mean I think I have a valid point no? Look at the borrowings vs deposit. I get the idea of liquidity injections but that is just a temp fix.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @stablekwon and @anchor_protocol
I address that later in the thread. I understand the point of the reserve but deposits are growing rapidly while borrowing is declining. Either borrowers need more incentive or depositors need less because without liquidity injections the reserve will keep drying up.
Image
2
2
Show replies
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
But if 20% isn't sustainable than people will eventually abandon the protocol when liquidity dries up anyway. I get that 20% is an amazing rate and that's why competitors can't offer it because they haven't found a sustainable way to do it. I hope anchor can trust me!
1