Do Kwon @stablekwonReplying to @CryptoKnight944Think higher quorum and deposit should do the trick1:02 AM · Dec 23, 2021·Twitter for iPhone4 Retweets132 Likes
Uniracer.Zer0@uniracer993·Dec 23, 2021Replying to @stablekwon and @CryptoKnight944166k voted yes? Wow11
frank@CryptoBanksy3·Dec 23, 2021it was only one whale voting yes. https://finder.extraterrestrial.money/mainnet/address/terra1r9d7fua9qvxuhjj9aznu2eeatd8f3uectprffr…12
frank@CryptoBanksy3·Dec 23, 2021Replying to @stablekwon and @CryptoKnight944Any chance of getting @nachodonUST back on the ticket to lead fam?1
Tyler K @DurdenkingTyler·Dec 23, 2021Replying to @stablekwon and @CryptoKnight944+ Adding no with veto option bls, as of now there is no consequence of trying to scam the community120
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
hanneswot@hanneswot·Dec 23, 2021I disagreed with ANC reduction and I think you are right, too many scam proposal and it needs only one to get missed.
Infosa@infosaaa·Dec 23, 2021Replying to @stablekwon and @CryptoKnight944Here you go. https://mirrorprotocol.app/#/gov/poll/186
Kulivoko@Kulivoko·Dec 23, 2021Replying to @stablekwon and @CryptoKnight944I think we should be able to punish creators of these proposals. If they have any other funds, confiscate all of it.
Purple Cow@PurpleCow0x·Dec 24, 2021Replying to @stablekwon and @CryptoKnight944Refunding deposit if quorum is met is also bad design. Vote "no" on the scam but in doing so help the scammer meet quorum requirement to get refund of deposit. Need "no with veto."