Conversation

2/ First, it creates *billions* in cashflows for luna stakers over the next 2 years and makes Luna a highly countercyclical asset. After col-5, all swap fees for burning Luna to Terra get paid out to Luna stakers spread out over 2 years.
2
410
3/ The staking rewards are paid out in UST, which makes Luna pretty unique among PoS assets in paying out double digit (13% pa so far) in non-recursive assets This makes Luna *countercyclical* to market downturns - when Luna price goes down, staking returns go up linearly
7
527
4/ Other staking assets don't have this property - in literally any other PoS system, price falls of the native staking asset also decreases the staking reward, as the basis is the same The community burn makes Luna a significantly more resilient asset to downturns
2
422
5/ Second, it's important to observe what the community does with the new 4-5B in UST to be minted - obviously creating 5B UST in a vacuum doesn't really do anything I've hinted that: 1. The CP will protect against depeg risk of UST 2. Insurance 3. Aid multichain expansion
4
364
6/ On depeg risk - I've grown quite tired of arguing with idiots on Twitter on whether UST can remain stable in bear. So soon I will propose creating multi billion dollar reserves in decentralized assets (BTC and others) in an attempt to save myself time. More to follow.
30
938
Wouldnโ€™t the purchase of this reserve create an expansion in Luna circulating supply? Perhaps itโ€™s done slowly enough that it only partially offsets the natural burn we would see had this not happened.
1
1
Your selling the ust to get the BTC reserves. When Ust is sold in any material way it leads to a decrease in price. To offset that price decrease Luna is minted.
3
1
If you sell a bunch of ust it would reduce the price, if there isnโ€™t offsetting demand. When price is reduced Luna is minted in order to get ust back on peg. Iโ€™m happy to be wrong, seeking to understand and havenโ€™t heard what I view as a correct counter
1
1
Show replies