Conversation

But I think if the Terra Community Pool is funding incentives, 1) the funds should be spent intelligently to maximize $UST adoption on Osmosis, 2) be done for the right reasons
3
84
First off, I think $LUNA incentives should be used to create a matching program for incentives for all pairs that use $UST as a quote currency. As for how much to each pool, think initial pools to be funded should be: OSMO-UST LUNA-UST USDC-UST
3
96
And we should absolutely apportion incentives for other pools, such as $XPRT-$UST $REGEN-$UST $AKT-$UST And others. These incentives should be matched dollar for dollar for incentives provided by each project, and should scale as other projects join the ecosystem.
3
91
Thoughts on incentives to $ATOM: I think $OSMO should be in the long term the vol quote currency of Osmosis and $UST the stable quote currency - Having two quote currencies for one dex is simply a waste of capital and is likely going to fragment liq
7
86
Think about what happend to $ETH pairs on most CEXs vs BTC pairs $ATOM pools should exist and should be incentivised, but competing with $OSMO on its own turf for liquidity (or at least incentivised competition) seems to be a waste of capital.
3
48
Disclosure: I hold more $ATOM and $OSMO than anyone likely to comment on this thread. Capital efficiency drives my advice to the Terra community, not tribalism. Osmosis should have one vol quote currency, not many.
2
107
As for the right reasons, it is inappropriate for the OP to claim that providing incentives on Osmosis "exposes Luna to the wider IBC ecosystem."
2
33
I am excited by IBC and am committed to seeing it succeed, but it is fact that Terra is much larger (yet) The dominant motivation should be: - IBC/Cosmos eco gets a decentralized & credible stablecoin - Terra has a chance to grow as Cosmos defi / ecosystem scales
5
258
Do I don’t know what you are talking about here mate. Can you at least keep it accessible for us plebs by at least signing off with a “UST UST UST UST” chant please.
1
9