Conversation
Sounds like the worst idea ever
3
1
29
Why?
3
7
Osmosis growth strategy should be to incentivise cosmos community treasuries to provide liq incentives on osmosis
And its own liq incentives should “match” third party incentives
2
1
19
In order to do this, expected return for rewards for communities should be first class treatment of their assets / maybe user acquisition
Selling off their native tokens regularly doesnt inspire much confidence in this direction
1
18
We have the same problem at terra where theres 20+ stablecoins and tons of airdrops
Dust collecting is not the direction we headed towards, because those token incentives were directed towards getting user attention even if they add friction
2
23
Oh that I definitely agree with!
I think the dust being talked about was literally when you have minuscule dust in an account (like <$1). It more just a UX thing, a way of cleaning up a wallet
So don't have to have bunch of token balances worth 13 cents, 5 cents, and 19 cents
5
1
35
This sounds like the best idea ever!
3
14
Show replies
AFAIK are working on something similar, at least when it comes to the token dust that comes from staking $LUNA
Quote Tweet
The picture you see below is something called "staking dust".
It secretly settles around so many $LUNA'tics accounts...
Even if you never asked for it.
The weirdest part?
This is what it can teach us about how staking really works on @terra_money: 
Show this thread
