Conversation

We’ve just had our first governance proposals of Mirror V2 end, and they both resulted in a rejection due to not reaching quorum. Obviously, this is not a good sign for the new governance but we can already see that it has increased participation compared to previous polls.

Do Kwon

@stablekwon

Replying to

@josephliow

I really reject the premise the goal of gov is to reach quorum on everything Hyundai is not even registrable (no oracle data for korean companies)

5:35 PM · Jul 2, 2021Twitter for iPhone

Replying to

and

Things will reach quorum if they are sufficiently interesting They will not if they are not interesting

Tweetzsche

@WiseMoriarty

Jul 2, 2021

I have changed my behaviour. I used only to vote if it was a 'yes'. Now I also vote 'no' e.g. $ATOM which is cheaply and easily available to hold elsewhere.

Show replies

Replying to

and

I agree, not every asset proposal should be voted in.

TeeTeeDaBeenBeen

@TeeTeeDaBeenBe1

Jul 2, 2021

I'm concerned as the traditional retail stock market sees less favorable conditions will discourage from the protocol. Some are scared but never fear $UST is stable and reward driven. Thanks. I do like $MIR though it has huge potential.

Replying to

and

Totally agree, the only goal is to make people active in checking what proposals are available to be voted on. After that the outcome just depends on whether it is interesting enough to engage, get the right votes and outcome! 👌🏻