Because we all stake (bought luna with our labor)to get that free shit. But telling where to stake or not isnโt fair. There are validators that are active and helped hundreds of us to learn how to use the protocols and some are near top5.
I see your argument but the decentralized stablecoin shouldn't be centrally validated. I think that's a pretty core tenant of the coin/ecosystem.
You don't have to pick one validator, you can put 10% into 10 you like, etc.
Also since Iโm sure you are clever you can find other way to control the voting power. ie someone mentioned a cap on staking luna amount per validator.
If heโs creating/leading the project and has his team on board with the decision that has nothing to do with a community vote. It would be more productive to discuss the potential second order effects than to focus on something irrelevant to the conversation while insinuating BS