Let’s really consider the options here. Tbh I’m slightly against the burn as I think funds should be used efficiently. Burning all this to pump price in the short term rather than use it to create critical infrastructure seems inefficient.
Conversation
Have you guys seen anyone post an actual risk analysis of the 'Yes' or 'No' vote? From what I have been able to gather from posts, his thought process is 'The Terra ecosystem will never be able to spend $1bil on infrastructure and $100mil is enough'.. Thoughts?
1
I have not yet most of these tweets was just my initial response to reading it. But maybe this vote is a bit rushed if all this information is not readily available for a voter. Maybe more off chain discussion of how to inform voters (including myself etc) is needed
1
1
I would tend to agree with that. Obviously we are outsiders looking in (at least I am, in terms of technical knowledge) but its possible that the people who proposed the vote think that it won't make a big difference in the long term. Especially if the price of $luna increases.
2
3
Actually this proposal was not made or inspired by tfl
Madeyourook is with (i think - not sure)
Rooks is our gfx and brand designer but I’m not sure who madeyourook is. Had nothing to do with the prop but as for Apollo dao we are all voting no
5